SAFE
CIC
The Safeguarding Specialists
01379 871091

SAFE Newsfeed

New age ratings to be introduced on Relationships, Sex and Health Education content in schools to ensure it is appropriately and sensitively taught.

Source: Department for Education published on this website Friday 17 May 2024 by Jill Powell

Following multiple reports of disturbing materials being used in Relationships, Sex and Health Education (RSHE) lessons, the Department for Education has published updated guidance that will ensure content is factual, appropriate and that children have the capacity to fully understand everything they are being taught.

Parents will have the right to see the resources that are being used to teach their children about relationships, health and sex in all circumstances and new age limits will be introduced so that children are not introduced to content they may not have the maturity to understand.

Sex education will not be taught before Year 5, and at that point from a purely scientific standpoint.

The contested theory of gender identity will not be taught and the guidance confirms copyright law should not be a barrier to sharing curriculum materials with parents – with the updated curriculum open for an eight week consultation from 16 May.

At secondary school pupils will learn about legally ‘protected’ characteristics, such as sexual orientation and gender reassignment, but the updated guidance is clear that schools should not teach about the concept of gender identity.

In light of the Cass Review, it is important that schools take a cautious approach to teaching about this sensitive topic, and do not use any materials that present contested views as fact, including the view that gender is a spectrum. This is in line with the Department’s gender questioning guidance, which also takes a cautious approach to assist teachers in ensuring they are acting in the best interests of children.

Education Secretary Gillian Keegan said:

This updated guidance puts protecting children at its heart, and enshrines parents’ right to know what their children are being taught.

It will support schools with how and when to teach often difficult and sensitive topics, leaving no doubt about what is appropriate to teach pupils at every stage of school.

Parents can be reassured once and for all their children will only learn age-appropriate content.

Schools should ensure that RSHE teaching materials are available to parents and that parents are aware of what is being taught.

New content in the guidance, mirroring letters sent by the Education Secretary to schools over the past year, makes it clear that schools should make materials available to parents, and clarifies how copyright legislation gives them scope to do so.

The guidance also now includes additional content on suicide prevention in the secondary health and wellbeing section, including equipping pupils to recognise when they or their peers need help.

The guidance has also been strengthened to help young people to understand the benefits of rationing time spent online and the impact on their wellbeing, and the serious risks of viewing content that promotes self-harm and suicide.

Following reports of schools seeing rising levels of harmful misogynistic behaviour, the guidance now includes a dedicated section on sexual harassment and sexual violence, which covers some specific types of abusive behaviour that were not explicitly discussed previously, such as stalking, as well as advice for teachers about how to address misogynistic online influencers. 

James Grimes, Head of Prevention at Gambling with Lives said:

We welcome this guidance as DfE is clearly learning from gambling-related deaths and lived experience of addiction.

Young people deserve the full picture about the impact of addictive gambling products and the link to mental health harms and suicide.

Jason Elsom, Chief Executive of Parentkind:

Our 2023 polling of parents relating to sex education revealed the very serious concerns of parents. We are grateful to the time that the Government has given to understanding and addressing those concerns during the past twelve months, and fully support this commitment to ensuring parents are well-informed and actively involved in their children’s education when it comes to sensitive topics such as Relationships and Sex Education (RSHE).

As the first educators of their children, parents deserve full transparency and access to the curriculum and resources used in schools.

This initiative to strengthen the partnership between schools and parents will foster a collaborative environment, ensuring that children receive comprehensive, balanced, and well-informed education while respecting parents’ roles and concerns. We believe that open communication and shared understanding are key to promoting the wellbeing and safety of all children.

Dr Alison Penny, Director of the Childhood Bereavement Network said:

Most children will face the death of someone important by the time they leave school – the big feelings this brings can leave them feeling isolated. Consistent evidence from recent surveys shows that children, young people, parents and teachers support grief education being covered sensitively in school, aligned with children’s wider learning opportunities at home.

This empowers them to cope with their own experiences, and be better allies for their grieving friends, building a compassionate community around the next generation.

Louis Appleby, Chair of the National Suicide Prevention Strategy Advisory Group said:

It’s vital that young people are able to understand thoughts of suicide or self-harm that they may be feeling, and that schools are confident in addressing this most sensitive of subjects. The new guidance aims to break down the shame that can make it hard to ask for help and, crucially, places an emphasis on safe ways of coping.

RSHE is vital in equipping students with the knowledge to make informed and ethical decisions about their wellbeing, health and relationships, setting them up for the future.

The updated guidance, which was informed by an independent panel, follows a thorough review by the government in response to disturbing reports that inappropriate material is being taught in some schools.

The draft guidance is now open to consultation. When final, the guidance will be statutory and schools will be expected to follow it.

Safeguarding children in elective home education

Source: Safeguarding Practice Review Panel published on this website Thursday 16 May 2024 by Jill Powell

This briefing paper from the Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel is part of an ongoing series of publications to share information arising from work undertaken by the panel with:

  • safeguarding partners
  • those working in child protection

The purpose of this briefing is to share learning from analyses of rapid reviews and local child safeguarding practice reviews (LCSPRs) to inform the work of safeguarding partners.

The briefing explores common themes and patterns identified across reviews and highlights practice issues raised by safeguarding partners from across England.

Eight-year ban for director of Scottish nuisance cold-calls firm

Source: The Insolvency Service published on this webpage Monday 13 May 2024 by Jill Powell

The director of a company which made millions of cold-calls has been banned from running a business for eight years. 

Duncan Paul, 51, of Glenorchard Road, Balmore, Glasgow, was the director of CRDNN Limited, which rang homes and businesses with unsolicited sales calls in 2018. 

Many of the calls were about window scrappage, debt management, window, conservatory and boiler sales while others falsely claimed to be working with Scottish and UK government energy saving schemes. 

In one case, calls made to a Network Rail control centre near Fort William clogged up the line, creating potential safety problems. 

The firm, based in Clydebank, Dunbartonshire, was fined the maximum £500,000 by the Information Commissioner’s Office in 2020 but went into liquidation without paying the fine. 

Paul’s co-director Stephen Foote, 44, was also banned as a director for eight years in January 2023. 

Mike Smith, Chief Investigator at the Insolvency Service, said: 

Duncan Paul’s company plagued homes and businesses with nuisance cold-calls, disrupting the lives of millions of people.

The calls were persistent, totally unsolicited, and to add to people’s frustration, they received further calls when they attempted to opt-out of receiving them.

Paul and Foote were the directors of this firm and we have taken robust action to prevent them each from running or managing any company for eight years. 

More than 63 million automated calls CRDNN made from June to the start of October 2018 connected. 

The Information Commissioner’s Office received almost 3,000 complaints from people during that period via its online reporting tool. 

A further 411 complaints were received via the online reporting tool of the Telephone Preference Service. 

CRDNN provided no evidence that recipients had given their consent to receive the calls. 

Trevor Callaghan, the ICO’s Director of Enforcement and Investigations, said: 

The directors of CRDNN knowingly operated their business with a complete disregard for not only the law but also public safety. They harassed millions of people, causing disruption, annoyance and distress and recklessly affected important services potentially putting the wider public in danger. That’s why their conduct called for the maximum fine possible under the law.

The ICO is committed to building strong partnerships with other agencies, including the Insolvency Service, to ensure our work has long term, tangible impact.

Disrupting the activities of these rogue companies and their directors ensures they can’t easily resurface under a different name and continue to cause further harm to people.

CRDNN was fined £500,000 for contravening regulation 19 and 24 of the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations 2003 relating to the use of automated calling systems. 

The company went into liquidation in January 2021 with the fine unpaid. 

The Secretary of State for Business and Trade accepted a disqualification undertaking from Paul, and his ban started on Thursday 2 May. 

Foote, of Meadow Rise, Newton Mearns, Glasgow, signed a disqualification undertaking which began in January 2023. 

The undertakings prevent the two from being involved in the promotion, formation or management of a company, without the permission of the court.  

Limitation law in child sexual abuse cases: consultation open

Source: Ministry of Justice published on this website 15 May 2024 by Jill Powell

This consultation paper seeks views on options for the reform of the law of limitation in child sexual abuse cases in England and Wales.

Specifically, it considers the recommendation by the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (‘the Inquiry’) on limitation law.

It also examines the law of limitation in child sexual abuse cases in other jurisdictions examined by the Inquiry and seeks views on options, other than removal of the limitation period, for reform of limitation law in child sexual abuse cases.

Lord Bellamy KC Parliamentary Under Secretary of State in the Forward to the consultations writes:

“The Government recognise that child sexual abuse is completely abhorrent and I want to pay tribute to the victims and survivors who came forward and told the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse about the abuse they had experienced. I also want to thank Professor Alexis Jay and the other panel members for the very thorough work they carried out on behalf of victims and survivors. At present child sexual abuse cases in the civil courts are normally subject to a three-year limitation period. This means that claims must be brought within three years of the abuse happening or the victim having knowledge of the abuse or alternatively, when the victim attains the age of 21 if they were under 18 when the abuse occurred. The law does also enable the courts to grant extensions to time limits where there are legitimate reasons for a delay in bringing a claim, and a significant number of historic child sexual abuse claims will involve applications for such extensions. In evidence to the Inquiry the Government recognised that some child sexual abuse claims were rejected because they were outside the standard three-year limitation period and there may be potential to assist in those cases by changes to the law of limitation. However, it was also recognised that changes to limitation law in child sexual abuse claims may have an impact on other groups and that ultimately our key focus is that a fair trial should be able to take place. The Inquiry made a number of recommendations for the law on limitation. These were focused on legislative reform to remove the three-year limitation period for personal injury claims brought by victims and survivors of child sexual abuse in respect of their abuse while also reflecting the importance of the right to a fair trial. In our response to the Inquiry, the Government accepted the critical issue this recommendation seeks to remedy (that a significant number of claims about child sexual abuse are rejected on grounds of the limitation period having passed) and agreed to consult on options for reform of limitation law in child sexual abuse cases. This consultation fulfils our promise to consult and the Government is keen to hear views on how limitation law can be reformed to protect the interest of victims and survivors while ensuring the right of defendants to a fair trial are maintained. The Government will consider all responses carefully and publish a response setting out the way forward in due course.”

Man responsible for extreme body modifications has been jailed

Source: Metropolitan Police published on this website Monday 13 May 2024

A criminal network who conducted extreme body modifications and illegal surgeries have been jailed after Met detectives uncovered their horrendous crimes

Specialist Met officers leading a unique investigation into the extreme body modification of men have seen seven men jailed today, Thursday, 9 May for a total of 79 years after a hearing at the Old Bailey.

Met detectives launched an investigation into the illegal surgical procedures after a victim was first identified by Devon and Cornwall Police in November 2020 after it was established the offending had taken place in North London.

Marius Theodore Gustavson, 46 (7.12.77), of Haringey was identified by detectives as being the primary offender following a lengthy and complex investigation. Alongside the six other men, he was jailed for life today with a minimum tariff of 22 years for:

Conspiring to commit grievous bodily harm

Five counts of causing grievous bodily harm with intent

One count of making an indecent photograph of a child

One count of distributing an indecent photograph of a child

Possession of extreme pornographic images

Distributing indecent pseudo images of children

The court heard how Gustavson used the internet to seek out and manipulate vulnerable people, coercing them to take part in the procedures.

Detective Inspector Amanda Greig, from the Met’s Specialist Crime Command, said: “I would like to highlight the excellent work of the Met’s investigation team, who have examined thousands of hours of horrific material seized from the suspects. Their diligence and professionalism have ensured no one else will suffer at the hands of these men.

“This lengthy and complex investigation demonstrates that we are determined to protect Londoners from harm and bringing those that threaten the safety of our communities to justice.”

Following the court hearing today, DI Amanda Greig also thanked the victims for their bravery throughout the investigation. She acknowledged their immense suffering – with many victims having profound mental health issues as a result of the group's brutal actions. The victims were supported by specialist officers and signposted to support services by the LGBT+ anti-abuse charity GALOP.

Detectives worked closely with partners from a number of UK police forces, NHS, London Ambulance Service, the General Medical Council and the Midwifery Council to help identify and support victims.

They discovered that Gustavson owned and managed the website ‘Eunuchmaker.com’ where he advertised extreme body modification services, including castration and penis removal. He also owned a production company, where he would record all the illegal mutilations and upload them to his site, which captured an international audience.

Officers interviewed and obtained statements from victim-survivors, who had been assaulted between February 2017 and January 2020.

In at least three cases, the injuries inflicted on the victims were life threatening, with one victim coming close to losing his life due to blood loss.

Officers sought the expertise of Consultant Urological Surgeon, Mr Chris Dawson, who stated “The procedures performed in these cases have highlighted the dangers involved in 'back street surgery'.

"To become a highly qualified surgeon takes a number of years, and these procedures should not be carried out by anyone without the necessary experience or expertise as it risks serious complications such as significant bleeding, or sepsis. When performed in hospital, these procedures are performed under general anaesthesia in a sterile environment, with the surgeon wearing sterile gown and gloves.

"The consent process is a very important part of any surgical procedure, and surgeons are held to very high standards about this. It is imperative that patients are aware of the potential complications of any surgical procedure."

A search of Gustavson’s address found various items, including

Boxes of medical needles and syringes,

Local anaesthetic packs,

Surgical tools,

A wooden chopping board and a mallet,

A body board with leg and arm restraints attached,

Disposable skin staplers,

Numerous medical procedure videos linked to Gustavson’s digital devices.

As Gustavson’s pattern of offending began to unravel, detectives were able to piece together that he was not working alone.

Following an interrogation of more than 120 digital devices the remaining offenders were identified by video footage, as well as phone communication with Gustavson. Ashley Williams, David Carruthers, Peter Wates, Janus Atkins, Ion Circuir were arrested at addresses in London, Scotland, Birmingham and South Wales. Stefan Scharf, a German national, was arrested whilst in transit at Heathrow Airport.

The majority of the offences occurred at Gustavson’s former home address, as well as a rented hotel room in London.

Anyone who has further information should contact police on 0208 785 8267 quoting Op Vicktor. Alternatively, you can provide information anonymously to the independent charity Crimestoppers on 0800 555 111 or online at crimestoppers-uk.org.

We encourage anyone who has had similar experiences to seek medical advice from their local sexual health clinic or GP. GALOP supports all LGBT+ victims and survivors of abuse: If you need advice or support, but aren't sure where to start, you can call them on 0800 999 5428.